Next rig? Work in progess…
Posted on December 29, 2008
I’m not buying anything yet since can’t really afford it. So I decided to wait until Duke Nukem Forever is released ;-)
Also, since I don’t really need retail box with cables and manuals and to save money I will buy OEM components.
| Image | Product Description | Total Price |
|---|---|---|
![]() |
$239.99 | |
![]() |
$125.99 | |
![]() |
$243.99 | |
![]() |
|
$97.79 |
![]() |
$229.49 | |
![]() |
$46.49 | |
![]() |
$51.25 | |
![]() |
|
$67.49 $67.49 |
| Subtotal: |
$1173 | |
Filed Under Uncategorized | 1 Comment
Rich internet applications
Posted on December 13, 2008
Flex, JavaFX, GWT, Silverlight something interesting is coming soon!
Filed Under Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Rum, red wine, honey + tree bark
Posted on December 11, 2008
Mama Juana from Dominican Republic and is really, really good, smooth drink. Right now I’m a happy consumer ;-)
Will buy again for sure! ( or should I homebrew some using maple syrop and wood from the backyard? Hmmm)
Filed Under Uncategorized | 3 Comments
Type and subclassing
Posted on December 5, 2008
I was reading Snyder’s 86 paper where he describes how inheritance violates encapsulations and it helped me realized the reason for duck typing.
In most modern OO languages we define a subtype (of class A) by inheritance (B : implements A). However what if B can be implemented more efficiently by using different algorithms while at the same time preserving the same programming interface (type). But now A and B have no common ancestors and in most languages will be treated as different types. So you can’t pass B to code that expects an object of type or subtype of A. To avoid this problem Snyder recommends to separate sub-typing from inheritance. Instead sub-typing should be based in behaviour of the objects. If instances of class B meet the external interface of class A, then B should be a subtype of A.
ps I thing functional languages like haskell and skala treat type issue more seriously.
Filed Under Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
TDD
Posted on November 26, 2008
When people develop software they are supposed to write lots of tests to guide the application design, and later use them for regression testing.
However I still don’t see why they are not using an impact analysis tool they will create a test suite with a subset of tests that will verify pieces affected by changes and no other tests. That would save so much time.
In fact I do not know of such tool myself.
Filed Under Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
SPAM
Posted on November 25, 2008
Some time ago I wrote a rant, about people on 8th floor of Hall building, who take thier shoes off, and put their legs with thier smelly socks on the tables.
Well, by now they are probably graduated, and started a socks advertising compaign. Here is a spam reply I got:
“Thanks for such an important articles about Socks. This is a very needed info about online socks buying.”
It’s pretty good actually. Kinda like google ads. They probably used public API of a blog search engine to find that post. I think that this is just a start, with more and more sites exposing their content and capabilities via ATOM, REST and web services those spam ad campaigns will be more and more targeted and personal.
Filed Under Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
The future is already here. It’s just not very evenly distributed.
Posted on November 16, 2008
Filed Under Uncategorized | 1 Comment
IDEA
Posted on November 16, 2008
Resharper for Eclipse. I wish ;-/
Filed Under Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Teamwork is a heroic actions by one individual.
Posted on November 16, 2008
*Sigh*
Filed Under Uncategorized | 1 Comment
Software development mythodology
Posted on November 9, 2008
Filed Under Uncategorized | 1 Comment








